RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04009
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her date of discharge on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 28 Feb 91.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her DD Form 214 reflects a discharge date of 31 May 88, but her Honorable discharge certificate from the Air National Guard reflects the correct date of 28 Feb 91.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 4 Feb 88, the applicant enlisted in the Florida Air National Guard (ANG).
On 2 Mar 88, the applicant entered active duty to attend Basic Military Training (BMT) and technical training.
On 31 May 88, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge from active duty due to having completed initial active duty for training (IADT), and reverted to her traditional (part-time) status as an ANG member.
On 28 Feb 91, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge from the ANG and was credited with 3 years and 27 days of total Reserve service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, paragraph 2.2, states that the DD Form 214 will be used when a member is released or discharged from active duty. Therefore, the applicants DD Form 214 will not reflect the period of time she served in the ANG, only the period of time she served on active duty. The applicant only served on active duty while attending Basic Military Training and Technical School prior to entering the ANG. She was discharged from the ANG on 28 Feb 91, which is correctly reflected on her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22. After reviewing the applicants DD Form 214 and her National Guard Bureau Form 22, both of these documents are correct.
A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04009 in Executive Session on 23 Oct 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, NGB/A1PS, dated 31 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jun 14.
3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
3
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03628
In support of the request, the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 256AF, a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a NGB Form 22. A1POE state they are unable to recommend any relief at this time since it appears the applicants time in the Air National Guard is correctly documented. The applicant was advised to contact HQ ARPC to see if a record of this time exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: As amended, his date of appointment into the Air National Guard (ANG) be changed from 17 Sep 12 to 1 Aug 12. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Air Force Recruiters failed to submit his AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03555
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be permanently awarded aeronautical wings. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. By letter dated 15 December 2011, NGB/A1PS requested that the applicant provide an AF Form 8, Certificate of Aircrew Qualification,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-00173
NGB/A1PS reviewed the evidence provided and concurs with restoring 32 days of leave to her leave account. a. Twenty-five and one half (25.5) days of leave were added to her leave account commencing 31 January 2007 and at the time of her retirement from the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program on 1 February 2007, she was authorized to receive cash settlement for an additional 25.5 days of unused accrued annual leave. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03619
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. However, evidence has been presented that her promotion package was not submitted in a timely manner in order for her to be considered by the same board as the other officers whose promotions were held up due to an administrative situation, which resulted in a later promotion effective date through no fault of their own. While the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00306
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2009-00306 in Executive Session on 7 April 2009,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01596
On 10 Dec 10, NGB/A1PS informed the applicant that he had not exhausted the administrative remedies regarding his application for correction of his military records. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01911
At the time she was discharged she had no idea that she was permanently disqualified from reentering a military service. The medical discharge is a false representation of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02768
After being successful in reenlisting in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he subsequently transferred back to his former unit with sufficient retainability for promotion; however, he was still not recommended for promotion. 2) His unit commander took him back on the basis that he would deploy and not be at the unit. However, since he was a member of the Air Force Reserve, the squadron commander of the unit he was assigned to (not the TDY commander) could have recommended him...